Are the Challenger's Hood Scoops Functional?

Discussion in 'Challenger DIY/Tech Info' started by SRT-Tom, Apr 4, 2020.

Car Parts
  1. SRT-Tom

    SRT-Tom Well-Known Member Staff Member Super Moderator Article Writer

    Posts:
    7,092
    Likes Received:
    2,221
    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2011
    Location:
    southern New Jersey
    About 10 years ago, an interesting experiment was conducted to see if the Challenger’s “functional” air scoops served any real purpose. Here are the results of testing using a digital thermometer and wireless probe with a range of maximum 139.8* F. All readings were taken from the same locations in the engine bay and under the same atmospheric conditions of 95F degrees and 51% humidity.

    During testing, the engine coolant temperature was in the 215 to 219F degree range. At idle there was no change, but when the vehicle was moving there was as much as a 20 degree difference at 70MPH (Note- The maximum the probe was capable of reading was 139.8F).

    It was suspected that the difference between the left and right fenders was due to the coolant bottle and overflow hose being on the driver's side. Those two components put off quite a bit of heat. So, it was concluded that the air scoops are of some benefit in helping to keep the engine cooler.

    Right Fender- Non-Functional vs Functional Hood Scoops
    110.4F (50MPH) 107.4F (50MPH)
    107.4F (70MPH) 104.6F (70MPH)

    Left Fender- Non-Functional vs Functional Hood Scoops
    138.0F (50MPH) 126.1F (50MPH)
    MAX (70MPH) 120.5F (70MPH)

    Center- Non-Functional vs Functional Hood Scoops
    MAX (50MPH) MAX (50MPH)
    MAX (70MPH) 131.0F (70MPH)


    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Apr 4, 2020
  2. Katshot

    Katshot Full Access Member

    Posts:
    1,136
    Likes Received:
    280
    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2020
    Location:
    Florida
    Speaking of Challenger air intake systems, I found a site online that tested a stock Scat Pack against a Shaker hood equipped version to see if the shaker hood offered any benefit. Surprisingly, testing verified that the shaker caused higher IAT readings so therefore worse engine output.
     
  3. 2017 Redline HC

    2017 Redline HC 2021 Durango RT

    Posts:
    1,105
    Likes Received:
    320
    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2019
    Location:
    Southern Ontario
    I just swapped my RT dummy vents for active vents. I’m sure any fresh air under the hood is a good thing.
    I know when its parked after an outing you can feel the heat venting out.
     
  4. SRT-Tom

    SRT-Tom Well-Known Member Staff Member Super Moderator Article Writer

    Posts:
    7,092
    Likes Received:
    2,221
    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2011
    Location:
    southern New Jersey
    The air in the new shaker air scoop takes a circuitous route to the throttle body. The original shakers on the 1970-1971 Challengers and 'Cudas were mounted directly on top of the carburetor. At the track, they were good for 5 hp. due to the cold air and ram effect at the top end.
     
  5. 2017 Redline HC

    2017 Redline HC 2021 Durango RT

    Posts:
    1,105
    Likes Received:
    320
    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2019
    Location:
    Southern Ontario
    I have been looking at shaker kits from Cervini’s and Autoform. I’m not sure I can use either with my Edelbrock intake and fuel rails. I think if I do try one I’d go with Autoform, the design is a true ram air type bringing air through the filter in the scoop and connects directly to the throttle body.
    I really like the car they used on their site as well!!:D

    http://autoformgroup.com/index.php?...mart_product_id=83&virtuemart_category_id=212

    DF2C5AF0-B14A-4957-A9F1-5164D3389FC3.png
     
    Last edited: Apr 5, 2020
  6. Katshot

    Katshot Full Access Member

    Posts:
    1,136
    Likes Received:
    280
    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2020
    Location:
    Florida
    Actually, I'd bet that's not the case. In order to take advantage of "ram-air effect" you need to place the scoop in a high-pressure zone. Unfortunately, the middle of the hood is a "low-pressure" zone.