The dealership can no longer hold on to the vehicles financially, so they probably have a insurance scam going on .
Rammstein.
You have more than enough power for the street already.. leave it be before that rabbit hole turns into a cave! Maybe a 3.73 rear differential.
Merry Christmas.
And I am sure once you inspect it , you will find other issues.. Though it does look nice, I would go for a new one that has all the comforts
So does Tire Warehouse. Though if you have a slow leak.... Once you mix air with the Nitrogen it don't much matter anymore.
The accented orange stitching interior looks the balls..
Are the turbos big bucks to replace.
That low output version is a boat load of torque. I suspect you will see them available in the Challengers & Chargers etc.
Nice color too..
Nice..
Try this, go to Crutchfield.com and put in your Challenger year and answer the questions about what stereo the vehicle had originally. See what...
You don't have to put the slotted rotors on the rear, but it might not look good.
Absolutely..
Marketing. FCA would look pretty dumb producing a extremely powerful vehicle without high end brakes. Your missing the point, what's wrong with...
Get a grip on your self, you will never be driving in Monoco in a F1 racing class. It just like all the stupid ads on TV where they show you...
If you have a stock air intake, l would bet it draws in cold air, it's not 1970 anymore folks.
Supposedly you drive 40-50 mph then press the brakes hard until you slow down to 20 mph, repeat 4or5 times. This is I guess a new pad rotor break...
You have to many variables there, you will drive yourself crazy. Call a locksmith or someone who does e key programming. Maybe they will help...
Is the 3.07 differential a 230mm or 195mm?
Curious on your swap 3.07 to 3.09 I thought the 3.07 only came on AWD vehicles?
I would call the locksmith...
You have a factory built race car, why f it up!!
Don't worry there will be ICE cars for a little while longer. There will be the variables for a lot of us, like which is more cost effective to...
75w-140 is fine also.
Separate names with a comma.
