K & N vs. Paper Filter

Discussion in 'Challenger DIY/Tech Info' started by SRT-Tom, Jun 13, 2012.

Car Parts
  1. SRT-Tom

    SRT-Tom Well-Known Member Staff Member Super Moderator Article Writer

    Posts:
    8,242
    Likes Received:
    2,795
    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2011
    Location:
    southern New Jersey
    A test was recently run comparing the horsepower and torque of a SVT 2012 Mustang GT using an OEM paper filter and a K & N filter.

    The results? The paper filter (when new) outperformed the K & N.

    Dyno runs:

    Stock Filter
    381.8HP 372.2TQ
    375.1HP 371.9TQ
    376.1HP 369.3TQ

    K&N Filter
    377.2HP 368.5TQ
    373.0HP 363.7TQ
    368.0HP 361.7TQ

    Read the entire comparison test here:

    SVTPerformance 2012 GT : K&N Replacement Filter Test - SVTPerformance
     
  2. Storm Rider

    Storm Rider Full Access Member

    Age:
    63
    Posts:
    1,294
    Likes Received:
    7
    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2011
    Location:
    High Point, NC
    That kind of put all of K&N's talk of being a better filter on the shelf. Especially when everyone knows their ads say that they add HP.